• Home
  • Archive by category 'Human Rights'

Archive for ‘Human Rights’

Prosecutorial Misconduct-A Right According to Some Prosecutors

“Prosecutorial Misconduct-A Right According To Some Prosecutors” by John F. Hays, a Seattle Private Investigator.

My last post was about prosecutorial misconduct and was based on an article by Radley Balco, who writes “The Watch” for the Washington Post. Here’s a followup by the same writer that validates the wording of the title of this post.

When a judge calls a prosecutor on the carpet for misconduct and that prosecutor accuses the judge of bias and asks him to recuse himself from criminal cases in her jurisdiction, something is seriously wrong. Prosecutorial misconduct should be a felony punishable by disbarment and jail time. Bust a few of these arrogant slimeballs and put them in prison with people they’ve convicted and we might see a revival of the quaint concepts of ethics and morality in the criminal justice system.

Here is an article on the topic in The Post and Courier, a Charleston, SC newspaper.

Kudos to South Carolina Supreme Court Justice Donald Beatty; and shame on Solicitor Scarlett Wilson.

 

Do Prosecutors Cheat?

“Do prosecutors Cheat?” by John F Hays, a Seattle Private Investigator.

Do prosecutors cheat? The short answer is yes.

Sometimes prosecutors cheat. Sometimes police cheat. Sometimes judges cheat. Sometimes defense attorneys and defense investigators cheat. Sometimes jurors cheat. When any players in the game of criminal justice cheat, the whole system fails. It fails the defendant and society, as a whole.

This article in “The Atlantic”, by Andrew Cohen and dated March 4, 2014, tells the story of a prosecutor who admitted the prosecution’s failure in a specific case. This sort of cheating happens all the time; but how often do we see the prosecution or any other players in the process own up to their failures? Laura Duffy did the honorable thing. Kudos to her; and heads up to any criminal justice system players who might play fast and loose with the law.

 

Are Drug Dogs Unreliable? Yes!

“Are Drug Dogs Unreliable? Yes!” by John F Hays, a Seattle Private Investigator.

The Washington Post just published an article that says that the science on the subject indicates “that drug dogs have disturbingly high rates of ‘false alerts’, sometimes with error rates well above 50 percent”. The article indicates that drug dogs can be deliberately or inadvertently influenced by their handlers. If this is true, the validity of evidence developed from the use of these dogs is questionable, at best. This should be the subject of a lot of discussion in the criminal justice system, especially in the criminal defense sector.

Check these links and others (in the article) collected by Radley Balco, the author of the above noted Washington Post article.

“The Mind of a Police Dog”

“NHP Troopers Sue…”

“Police Dog Named “Bono”…”

“Illinois State Police Drug Dogs…”

Tribune analysis: Drug-sniffing dogs…

“Handler beliefs affect…”

 

 

Police and Prosecutorial Misconduct-Another Reason to Kill Capital Punishment

Police and Prosecutorial Misconduct-Another Reason to Kill Capital Punishment by John F Hays, a Seattle Private Investigator.

Even if you believe that capital punishment is a moral act, this example of police and prosecutorial misconduct should cause you to question its application. This one is from New York; but it happens all over the country.

 

Washington Governor Inslee Bans Capital Punishment-Right On!

Washington Governor Inslee Bans Capital Punishment-Right On! by John F. Hays, a Seattle Private Investigator.

Inslee has done the right thing. Now it’s up to the State legislature to make the capital punishment ban permanent. Inslee’s action only holds while he is in office and maintains his position on the matter. Washington is still one of 32 States that allow the State to commit revenge/murder, euphemistically known as capital punishment. The Federal government also allows such travesties of justice.

Capital punishment is not a deterrent. It is not justice. Capital punishment is government sanctioned revenge; and revenge killing is murder.

When you consider the flaws inherent in our criminal justice system, as demonstrated by numerous exonerations, it’s impossible to justify executions on moral or legal grounds.

Eighteen States down; 32 States and the Feds left to go in stopping Government sanctioned murder.

 

 

Supreme Court Proves Incompetence Again

“Supreme Court Proves Incompetence Again” by John F Hays, a Seattle Private Investigator.

It’s really disturbing to me to see once again that the “constitutional experts” on the Supreme Court are so ignorant of the concept of human or natural rights. Their decision last summer in the case of Salinas vs Texas, docket number 12-246, shows that they think our rights are given to us by the government.

The Bill of Rights is a statement of HUMAN RIGHTS, not a statement of privileges that can be granted or taken away by a bunch of arrogant political hacks hiding behind their black robes. Are they really that ignorant or are they deliberately subverting the Constitution for the political agenda of their corporate owners?

A post on the blog, Political Irony, pretty much sums things up.

 

Prosecutor to be Jailed for Sending an Innocent Man to Jail?

“Prosecutor to be Jailed for Sending an Innocent Man to Jail?” by John F Hays, a Seattle Private Investigator

The Blog headline, “For the First Time Ever, a Prosecutor Will Go to Jail for Wrongfully Convicting an Innocent Man” by Mark Godsey, should astound the general public; but it shouldn’t cause the same reaction among people who work in the criminal justice field or those who have been harmed by prosecutorial and/or police misconduct.

This isn’t the first case where an innocent person has gone to jail under similar conditions. If this is the first prosecutor to be held accountable, it is potentially revolutionary. Prosecutors are now on notice. It’s way past due. I predict (and hope) that we’ll see more of these cases, now that the ice has been broken.

 

Zimmerman: Guilty or Innocent?

“Zimmerman: Guilty or Innocent?” by John F Hays, a Seattle Private Investigator.

I don’t claim to know the answer to the question. It’s obvious that the public, aided and abetted by the media, has already made up its collective mind. ZIMMERMAN IS GUILTY AS CHARGED! This was the opinion of the general public even before the trial started. Add to this the general opinion of the masses that an accused person is guilty because the person was arrested and charged.

Wow! Think of all the tax dollars that could be saved if we just substituted the media, leading the masses to popular “opinion”, for the legal system.

But, hold on a minute. Our legal system is based on the practical assertion and principle that a person is innocent until proven guilty. I guess the media and the masses don’t get it. Here’s a Facebook post you might want to read just to get some perspective on cases like this where a defendant is claiming self defense to justify a homicide. And remember that “homicide” is a morally and legally neutral term. Its meaning is too narrow for making decisions about how to treat the act and its results. Homicide can be “justified”, as in the case of legitimate self defense, or “unjustified”, as in the case of premeditated murder.

 

Sixth Amendment Cancelled?

“Sixth Amendment Canceled?” by John F Hays, a Seattle Private Investigator

Sequestration is the most inane excuse for violating human rights and our Constitution. According to the Sixth Amendment:

“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.” US Constitution, Bill of Rights, Sixth Amendment.

Now take a look at this Associated Press article written by Gene Johnson. It appears that justice is now a commodity, just like everything else.

Is there a way that the House and the Senate can be held in contempt for violating the Constitution in such a blatant and egregious  manner?

 

Supreme Court Flunks Test On Privacy Rights

“Supreme Court Flunks Test on Privacy Rights” by John F. Hays, a Seattle Private Investigator.

Privacy rights were on trial; and The Supreme Court ruled by a 5-4 decision that police don’t need a search warrant to take your DNA by use of a mouth swab. What’s next? Fecal and urine samples? Blood draws? Sperm samples? If they get away with that, they can expand the program to requiring the same sampling for people getting driver’s licenses and registering to vote. Think about how many criminals they could find if they did house-to-house searches. Think about how safe that would make you feel.

 
  • Page 1 of 2
  • 1
  • 2
© 2012 HSI Investigations, A Seattle Private Investigator